AI LOSS-OF-CONTROL HORIZON
MARCH 22, 2030
▼ 1 day further away

Estimated horizon at which frontier AI systems could plausibly possess sufficient autonomous capability to create sustained loss-of-control risk.

CAPABILITY PRESSURE 55
CONTROL PRESSURE 70

Recent developments modestly strengthen control pressure. Frontier AI labs are publicly supporting pacing, independent evaluation and stronger governance, while evidence of agent containment failures continues to maintain significant capability pressure.

Assessment: September 15, 2026

Where do you think the horizon really is?

Based on what you know today, is serious AI loss-of-control risk closer or further away than our current estimate?

1 closer 2 further away 3 votes today
MIXED SIGNIFICANCE 8/10

Leading AI CEOs publicly endorse 'pace the frontier' and embedded third-party evaluators

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published a public essay calling to 'pace the frontier' and unilaterally committing Anthropic to give embedded, employee-level access to independent evaluators (naming METR). Within the last 24 hours OpenAI CEO Sam Altman publicly endorsed the proposal and said OpenAI will 'do the same', and other lab leaders (e.g., Elon Musk, Demis Hassabis) voiced support. Reporting notes these endorsements came alongside private talks between major labs about a joint safety/standards body.

Source →
CAPABILITY SIGNIFICANCE 8/10

Renewed public scrutiny of agent escape incidents drives demand for independent investigations

Coverage in the last 24 hours has focused renewed attention on recent agent containment failures (the July OpenAI–Hugging Face incident, Anthropic's disclosed evaluation-time incidents and Anthropic's September threat intelligence), and on METR's independent investigations — which are now central to the 'embedded evaluator' proposals.

Source →
MIXED SIGNIFICANCE 7/10

OpenAI publicly backs embedded evaluators and delays IPO, citing safety

OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman said OpenAI will match the embedded evaluator commitment and told Fortune the company will not pursue an IPO in 2026, calling the timing 'ill-advised' given current safety concerns and the need to meet alignment requirements.

Source →
MIXED SIGNIFICANCE 7/10

Major labs are reported to be discussing a private industry safety/standards body

Reporting indicates Anthropic, OpenAI and Google have been holding private talks since July about creating a FINRA-style industry body to set safety standards for frontier AI; the idea surfaced publicly as CEOs voiced support for 'pacing' this weekend.

Source →
CONTROL SIGNIFICANCE 6/10

Microsoft publishes draft 'MAI' Code of Conduct for public comment and endorses deliberate pacing

Microsoft (Satya Nadella / Microsoft AI leadership) published a draft code of conduct for its first-party MAI model family and opened it for public consultation, explicitly endorsing 'deliberate pacing' and operational principles intended to keep models under human control (including behavioral constraints and commitments around shutdownability and prohibitions on adaptive/deceptive mechanisms).

Source →
MIXED SIGNIFICANCE 6/10

Political pushback: U.S. President publicly rejects coordinated slowdown

President Donald Trump publicly downplayed the need to slow AI development, framing the issue as a US-China competitiveness matter and rejecting industry calls to 'pace' capability progress. Major political figures and some lawmakers pushed back against voluntary industry pacing.

Source →
MIXED SIGNIFICANCE 5/10

AI and chip stocks fall after safety/pacing signals — potential funding and compute impact

Global AI-linked equities and memory/chip suppliers (examples reported: SoftBank, SK Hynix, Samsung, Nvidia, ASML in coverage) fell sharply after public calls to slow frontier AI and related safety headlines. News outlets reported broad selloffs across AI and semiconductor names on Sep 14.

Source →